The Miller Law Firm is proud to highlight insights from Executive Partner Martha J. Olijnyk, featured in a recent issue of Michigan Lawyers Weekly regarding the American Bar Association’s newly issued Formal Opinion 519 and its impact on attorney withdrawal from client representation.
The opinion addresses an important ethical question facing attorneys: how to balance the need to withdraw from a representation with an attorney’s continuing duty to protect client confidentiality.
ABA Formal Opinion 519 reinforces that an attorney’s duty of confidentiality does not end when seeking to withdraw from a matter. Instead, lawyers must carefully limit any disclosures made in support of a withdrawal request and avoid revealing information related to the representation unless an applicable exception exists or the client provides informed consent.
In discussing the opinion, Martha explained that the guidance serves as an important reminder for attorneys to consider the full scope of their ethical responsibilities when navigating withdrawal. Rather than focusing solely on the mechanics of leaving a representation, attorneys must evaluate their continuing obligations to their clients and the profession.
The opinion encourages attorneys to take a measured approach when seeking withdrawal, beginning with limited explanations and using protective measures such as sealed filings or in-camera review when additional information is required.
Martha’s discussion highlights the ongoing importance of attorney-client confidentiality and the careful judgment required when ethical duties intersect with procedural requirements. As courts and attorneys continue to navigate these issues, guidance like Formal Opinion 519 provides a framework for protecting client interests while addressing the practical challenges of representation.
Congratulations to Martha Olijnyk for sharing her expertise and contributing to the continued discussion of professional responsibility within the legal community.